<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Language Museum &#187; Hieroglyphics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.language-museum.com/blog/category/hieroglyphics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.language-museum.com/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:34:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unlocking languages through maths</title>
		<link>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/04/27/unlocking-languages-through-maths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/04/27/unlocking-languages-through-maths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hieroglyphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pictish inscriptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Picts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[written language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.language-museum.com/blog/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers at the University of Essex in England have unlocked the secrets of ancient symbols – using mathematics. Through statistical analysis, they found that the symbols on Pictish inscriptions in stone were likely to represent a written language, according to this article. The team devised a new method of analysing the symbols by comparing them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.language-museum.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Pict-symbols-300x211.gif" alt="Pict symbols" title="Pict symbols" width="300" height="211" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-722" />Researchers at the <a href="http://www.essex.ac.uk/">University of Essex</a> in England have unlocked the secrets of ancient symbols – using mathematics.</p>
<p>Through statistical analysis, they found that the symbols on Pictish inscriptions in stone were likely to represent a written language, according to <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18725-mathematics-of-ancient-carvings-reveals-lost-language.html">this article</a>. </p>
<p>The team devised a new method of analysing the symbols by comparing them to known texts from the history, and whilst they still do not know what the writing means, they suspect the stones are memorials for the dead. <a href="http://www.orkneyjar.com/history/picts/index.html">The Picts</a> were a Scottish <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Age">Iron Age</a> society dating from the fourth to the ninth centuries AD. </p>
<p>The research could help unlock other scripts, and perhaps even animal communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/04/27/unlocking-languages-through-maths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The writing on the (cave) wall</title>
		<link>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/02/28/the-writing-on-the-cave-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/02/28/the-writing-on-the-cave-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hieroglyphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Scientist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prehistoric symbols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primitive language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rudimentary language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.language-museum.com/blog/?p=642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incredible article in New Scientist this week, about prehistoric symbols discovered in caves in southern France. Whilst artwork on the cave walls has been studied intensively, new research has shown that previously-ignored ‘doodles’ could be evidence of a primitive precursor to writing. A postgraduate student at the University of Victoria, Canada, built a database of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.language-museum.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Chauvet-rock-art-300x219.jpg" alt="Chauvet cave art" title="Chauvet cave art" width="300" height="219" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-643" />Incredible article in <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/">New Scientist</a> this week, about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistory">prehistoric</a> symbols discovered in caves in southern France.</p>
<p>Whilst <a href="http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/chauvet/">artwork</a> on the cave walls has been studied intensively, new research has shown that previously-ignored ‘doodles’ could be evidence of a primitive precursor to writing. A postgraduate student at the University of Victoria, Canada, built a database of signs from caves all over France and the results were striking – signs drawn in the same style, appeared at numerous different sites, which could indicate the beginnings of a simple language system. The earliest recorded pictograph writing systems are thought to date to 5,000 years ago, but this discovery may change current thought.</p>
<blockquote><p>..One of the most intriguing facts to emerge from von Petzinger&#8217;s work is that more than three-quarters of the symbols were present in the very earliest sites, from over 30,000 years ago.</p>
<p>&#8220;I was really surprised to discover this,&#8221; says von Petzinger. If the creative explosion occurred 30,000 to 40,000 years ago, she would have expected to see evidence of symbols being invented and discarded at this early stage, with a long period of time passing before a recognisable system emerged. Instead, it appears that by 30,000 years ago a set of symbols was already well established.</p>
<p>That suggests we might need to rethink our ideas about prehistoric people, von Petzinger says. &#8220;This incredible diversity and continuity of use suggests that the symbolic revolution may have occurred before the arrival of the first modern humans in Europe.&#8221; If she is right, it would push back the date of the creative explosion by tens of thousands of years.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read the rest of the article <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527481.200-the-writing-on-the-cave-wall.html?DCMP=NLC-nletter&#038;nsref=mg20527481.200">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/02/28/the-writing-on-the-cave-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The SarcMarc</title>
		<link>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/01/25/the-sarcmarc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/01/25/the-sarcmarc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hieroglyphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punctuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punctuation mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcasm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcasm punctuation mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SarcMarc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.language-museum.com/blog/?p=597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, just what I’ve always wanted – a punctuation mark for sarcasm! Yep, those of you who have mastered the art can now make it totally clear when you’re being sarcastic in writing. The invention of American company Sarcasm, Inc. (interesting, since arguably the British are masters of the sarcastic comment), the SarcMarc can be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.language-museum.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Bass-clef.png" alt="Bass clef" title="Bass clef" width="30" height="33" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-598" />Ah, just what I’ve always wanted – a punctuation mark for sarcasm!</p>
<p>Yep, those of you who have mastered the art can now make it totally clear when you’re being sarcastic in writing. The invention of American company Sarcasm, Inc. (interesting, since arguably <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4384734.stm">the British are masters</a> of the sarcastic comment), the <a href="http://02d9656.netsoljsp.com/SarcMark/modules/user/commonfiles/loadhome.do">SarcMarc</a> can be downloaded for US$1.99 and is available for Windows, Mac and Blackberry products.</p>
<p>Want to know how to spot when you’ve been sarc’ed? Look out for something like an upside-down <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clef#The_bass_clef">bass clef</a> (see the picture above). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2010/01/25/the-sarcmarc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rosetta Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2009/08/18/the-rosetta-stone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2009/08/18/the-rosetta-stone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demotic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hieroglyphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idioms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Museum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el-Rashid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandiorite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Napoleon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosetta Stone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.language-museum.com/blog/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In London recently, I dropped by to see The Rosetta Stone at the British Museum. This slab of granodiorite is so famous that I could barely get near it for all the people craning over each other to take a close look. So why were all those people so eager to look at a big [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.language-museum.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/P10906081-225x300.jpg" alt="The Rosetta Stone" title="The Rosetta Stone" width="225" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-343" />In London recently, I dropped by to see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosetta_Stone">The Rosetta Stone</a> at the <a href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/">British Museum</a>. This slab of <a href="http://geology.about.com/od/rocks/ig/igrockindex/rocpicgranodiorite.htm">granodiorite</a> is so famous that I could barely get near it for all the people craning over each other to take a close look.</p>
<p>So why were all those people so eager to look at a big stone? And why is it so important?</p>
<p>Weighing in at around three-quarters of a ton, the stone is approximately 118cm high, 77cm wide and 30cm deep. Discovered by <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/bonaparte_napoleon.shtml">Napoleon</a>’s army in 1799, the Rosetta Stone is named after the place it was found – near <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=el-rashid+egypt&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;um=1&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;split=0&#038;gl=uk&#038;ei=9b-NSpvRKJ7UjAeB9bSBDg&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=geocode_result&#038;ct=title&#038;resnum=1">el-Rashid</a> (Rosetta) in present day Egypt. When Napoleon’s army was defeated, the stone became the property of the English, and has been <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/british-museum-shines-new-light-on-the-rosetta-stone-of-pharaohs-and-gods-552097.html">on display</a> in the British Museum since 1802 (although its presence is <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/3084215.stm">debated</a>). </p>
<p>The Rosetta Stone is inscribed with three columns of different languages – <a href="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/244595/Greek-language">Greek</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demotic_%28Egyptian%29">Demotic</a> and <a href="http://www.ancient-egypt-online.com/history-of-hieroglyphics.html">hieroglyphics</a>, which all have the same message. The inscription on the stone is a decree passed by a council of priests – but it’s not so much what is written that’s important (although it does tell us a lot), it’s what knowledge can be gained from the inscription. </p>
<blockquote><p>The decree is inscribed on the stone three times, in hieroglyphic (suitable for a priestly decree), demotic (the native script used for daily purposes), and Greek (the language of the administration). The importance of this to Egyptology is immense. Soon after the end of the fourth century AD, when hieroglyphs had gone out of use, the knowledge of how to read and write them disappeared. In the early years of the nineteenth century, some 1400 years later, scholars were able to use the Greek inscription on this stone as the key to decipher them. Thomas Young, an English physicist, was the first to show that some of the hieroglyphs on the Rosetta Stone wrote the sounds of a royal name, that of Ptolemy. The French scholar Jean-François Champollion then realized that hieroglyphs recorded the sound of the Egyptian language and laid the foundations of our knowledge of ancient Egyptian language and culture.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Source: <a href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_objects/aes/t/the_rosetta_stone.aspx">British Museum</a>). </p>
<p>As you can see, it is hugely important to language, and the term “Rosetta Stone” has become idiomatic </p>
<blockquote><p>as something that is a critical key to the process of decryption or translation of a difficult encoding of information. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosetta_Stone#Idiomatic_use">source</a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>Its importance is highlighted with the Rosetta Project, which I will be looking at in my next post….</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.language-museum.com/blog/2009/08/18/the-rosetta-stone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

